Lyric wrote: Mon Jul 13, 2026 8:55 am
I never asked for or expected anything from Pig. Pig and I did not know each other outside of the game. He made his own decision and in the logs available you'll see I asked for nothing.
You cannot equate asking for and receiving game breaking items in the case of Bushdoctor and Meatgrinder to a GM being cordial or friendly to another player and perhaps oversharing in enforcement topics.
The ruling has been made.
I'm so sorry but you’re missing the entire point of why people are upset. Even if we take you at your word that you "never asked for anything," you still reaped the benefits of a completely compromised, biased GM who was clearly favoring you. Even though those benefits (the ones we seen) were >negligible<.
You dont have to explicitly ask for game-breaking items to be complicit. Accepting Pig`s "oversharing in enforcement topics" is a massive competitive advantage. If a GM is feeding you information or treating you differently because he is simping or being friendly, the integrity of the server itself is already ruined.
Saying "the ruling has been made" just sounds like you are not really aware that you need to be held accountable, just as Meatgrinder had been.